Minmax KL Learning + HOG on INRIA Person Database


1. Introduction

2. Results

I use varying number of features. And plot the ROC and DET. On ROC, I compute the AUC. On DET, I compute the EQ point, i.e., where false positive rate and miss rate are equal. The results reported in HOG paper (CVPR) is EQ 0.01.

EXP1

The images are 57x148, numbers of examples are as follows.

 

Training

Testing

Positive

1540

564

Negative

12180

5047

 

 

 

For HOG, I extract 972 candidate features for each image.

 

# of features

AUC

EQ

Miss rate at false positive rate=1e-3

Miss rate at FPR=1e-4

50

0. 95827

0.102

 

 

100

0.9703

0.089

 

 

150

0.9728

0.085

 

 

200

0.9735

0.083

 

 

250

0.9753

0.079

 

 

300

0.9755

0.078

 

 

350

0.9763

0.077

 

 

400

0. 97517

0. 079

0. 74645

0.94858

500

0. 97693

0. 0728

0. 70567

0.93262

600

0.9773

0. 0735

0.71631

0.93972

700

0. 97702

0. 076

0. 72518

0. 9344

800

0. 9771

0.0759

0.69681

0.92908

900

0.9776

0.0727

0.69504

0.93617

950

0.9783

0.0727

0.70567

0.93972

Original HOG

 

0.01

0.04

0.1

 

When I flip the examples to get # of negatives double

 

Training

Testing

Positive

1520x2=3080

564x2=1128

Negative

12180x2=24360

5047x2=10094

 

 

 

# of features

AUC

EQ

Miss rate at false positive rate=1e-3

Miss rate at FPR=1e-4

100

0.97885

0.0744

0.64184

0.81915

300

0.98337

0.066

0.52837

0.87234

500

0.98314

0.0637

0.60106

0.91844

650

0.98387

0.0620

0.62145

0.89982

700

0.98366

0.0624

0.59309

0.89362

750

0.98365

0.0629

0.58777

0.88475

800

0.98342

0.0613

0.60106

0.86613

850

0.98331

0.0629

0.63918

0.86702

900

0.98338

0.0629

0.63298

0.89982

972

0.9833

0.0623

0.61968

0.90603

Original HOG

 

0.01

0.04

0.1

 

When I re-cut the negative examples, together with flipping copies, there are 97440 negative examples for training.

0.9825

 

Training

Testing

Positive

1540x2=3080

564x2=1128

Negative

48720x2=97440

20188x2=40376

 

 

 

# of features

AUC

EQ

Miss rate at false positive rate=1e-3

Miss rate at FPR=1e-4

100

0.97841

0.0730

0.47872

0.71809

300

0.98357

0.0638

0.41401

0.74025

500

 

 

 

 

650

 

 

 

 

700

 

 

 

 

750

0.0629

0.45656, 0.81294

 

 

800

 

 

 

 

850

 

 

 

 

900

 

 

 

 

972

 

 

 

 

Original HOG

 

0.01

0.04

0.1

3. TODO List

1. Visualize intermediate results.

2. Use correct training negative examples. Crop negative examples exhaustly --- negative examples mining.

3. Fit the histogram p_{n-1}(r_n) and f(r_n) using Gaussian or exponential.

4. Compare Generative Boosting + Gabor

5. Add shiftmax to HOG and Gabor to make them active

6. Combine Active Basis and HOG under Generative Boosting.

7. EM and mixture model

8. Add inhibition to simplify the reweighting, i.e., when updating histogram p_{n-1}(r_n) , independent features are not updated. This will improve the speed and make the generalization better.


Haifeng GONG (C) 2008