Name:
Once again, consider the salaries of 52 faculty from
some northwestern college. Someone believes that not only do men start
out making more money than women there, but the menís salaries climb faster
with experience, too.
y = beta0 + beta1 * (x2) + beta2*x1 + beta3*(x1*x2)
If you are male,then x2=0 and your intercept is beta0
and your slope is beta2. If you are female, then x2=1 and your intercept
is beta0+beta1 and your slope is beta2+beta3
Terms = (yeargender Year Sex)
Coefficient Estimates
Label Estimate Std. Error t-value
Constant 18222.6 1159.01 15.723
yeargender -277.228 362.609 -0.765
Year 741.024 111.799 6.628
Sex 102.725 2042.43 0.050
R Squared: 0.559673
Sigma hat: 3845.89
Number of cases: 52
Number of cases used: 51
Degrees of freedom: 47
This is the model given in Part 1. If we believed
that all of the terms were significant, then it says that men make, as
an average starting salary,
18222.6, and women make, on average, 102.72 more (as
a starting salary-- that is, when Year=0). But then the men's slope
is 741, which means for each additional year of experience they are making
741 dollars more, on average. But women, on the other hand, are making
less by 741-277 per year.
However, the t-statistics for yeargender and sex are so
small, that if we were to test for a relationship on sex, yeargender and
year being held constant, we would find it insignificant. And the same
can be said for yeargender holding sex and year constant. If we could,
we should take sex out of the model and recompute.
Most likely we'll find that there is no difference due
to gender, and that men and women have the same slope and intercept.