The researchers decided that there were two main confounding factors that had to be
 controlled:

     a.the neighborhood in which the Exposed child lives and
     b.the age of the Exposed child.

 So, for each child in the Exposed group, a "match" was chosen from the same
 neighborhood and age group, but care was taken that this childís parents did not work
 around lead.  These children comprise the Control group.

 Now, if differences in the lead levels are found between the Exposed and Control groups,
 we know that the difference cannot be due to differences in age or neighborhood, since
 both groups are similar in these characteristics.

 Forming Matched Pairs

 It is not easy to form matched pairs.  Researchers must carefully search for another child
 of the same age in the same neighborhood, and the parents of this matched child must
 consent to allow their child to participate in the study.  Initially, this study began with 34
 children in the Exposed group, but one child was dropped because researchers couldnít
 find a matched pair.

Record your answers to these questions:
1. Is this an observational or a controlled study? Why?
 
 

 2. The authors identified Age and Neighborhood as potential confounding variables.
 Compare these two to your choices.  Explain how these variable could confound the
 study.
 
 

 3.  By matching each Exposed child to a Control child, the researchers can control for
 Age and Neighborhood.   In effect, instead of having 33 Exposed subjects plus 33
 Control subjects (for a total of 66 subjects) the researchers now have just 33 pairs.
 Given the study design, what sort of evidence would be required to convince you
 that the worker's exposure to lead put their children at risk for lead poisoning?
 

Continue